CLINICAL EVIDENCE
Proven in practice.
Not just theory.
Validated in 500+ real-world clinical procedures, including results from a peer-reviewed, published study of the first 125 consecutive patients.¹ Outperforms traditional at-home prep.
CLINICAL VALIDATION
Peer-reviewed. Published. 500+ procedures.
Colonoscopy Without Early Preparation (CWEP)
A retrospective clinical study of clinic-based warm-water bowel preparation
PROCEDURES
500+
SETTING
SUPERVISED CLINICAL
OUTCOME SCALE
Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS)
ADVERSE AFFECTS
ZERO SERIOUS
96.3%
ADEQUATE OR BETTER PREP²
98.4%
PATIENT COMPLETION RATE³
100%
PATIENT SATISFACTION⁴
100%
PREFERRED OVER PRIOR ORAL PREP⁵
CATEGORY CONTEXT
The science ZeraFlow builds on
Why clinic-based warm-water preparation outperforms oral prep
Independent clinical research consistently demonstrates that supervised, clinic-based warm-water bowel preparation achieves adequacy rates significantly exceeding those of at-home oral regimens. The core advantage is control: removing preparation from an uncontrolled home environment and placing it in a standardized clinical workflow eliminates the patient compliance variable that drives most oral prep failures.
Ziv Y, Scapa E. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2013;17:39–44.The scale of the oral prep failure problem
Across published real-world studies, 18–35% of colonoscopies are performed with inadequate or suboptimal bowel preparation. Inadequate prep directly degrades visualization, increases procedure time, and raises the risk of missed pathology — with polyp miss rates as high as 42–48% in poorly prepped colons.
Bucci C et al. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014. van Rijn JC et al. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006.WHAT COMES NEXT
International validation complete. U.S. pilot next.
COMPLETE
International clinical study
COMPLETE
Peer-reviewed publication
IN PROGRESS
FDA 510(k) clearance
UPCOMING
U.S. clinical pilot (~1,000)
UPCOMING
U.S. publication and scale
NEXT MILESTONE
U.S. Clinical Pilot — Post FDA Clearance
Following FDA clearance, Zera Medical will conduct a structured U.S. clinical pilot across one to three flagship GI practices and ASCs, enrolling approximately 1,000 procedures. Results will be prepared for peer-reviewed publication.
TARGET ENROLLMENT
~1,000 PROCEDURES
PRIMARY ENDPOINT
BBPS ADEQUACY RATE
SECONDARY ENDPOINTS
SAFETY, SATISFACTION, EFFICIENCY
PUBLICATION PLAN
PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL
Medical Advisory Board
-

Dr. Andrew Aneese
-

Professor Dan Carter
Associate Professor of Medicine & Director of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Israel
-

Dr. Michael Levin
Urologic Oncologist & Robotic Surgery Specialist, Corewell Health Beaumont Troy Hospital, St Joseph Mercy, MI
Ready to learn more or become a pilot site?
Bring ZeraFlow to your practice. Join our U.S. pilot program or connect with our team to learn more.
¹ Ziv Y, Scapa E. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2013;17:39–44. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0876-8.
² ³ ⁴ ⁵ Ziv Y, Scapa E. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2013;17:39–44. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0876-8.
ZeraFlow is an investigational device. It has not been cleared or approved by the U.S. FDA and is not currently available for commercial sale in the United States.